RE: [PATCH v4 0/4] support watchdog with longer timeout period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andy, Guenter,

Did you understand to which branch it will be better to take this patchset?

Thanks,
   Michael.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 7:14 PM
> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-
> watchdog.org>; Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Darren Hart
> <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Platform Driver
> <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vadim Pasternak
> <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] support watchdog with longer timeout period
> 
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:09 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 5/4/20 7:14 AM, michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > > Michael Shych (4):
> > >   platform_data/mlxreg: support new watchdog type with longer timeout
> > >     period
> > >   platform/x86: mlx-platform: support new watchdog type with longer
> > >     timeout
> > >   watchdog: mlx-wdt: support new watchdog type with longer timeout
> > >     period
> > >   docs: watchdog: mlx-wdt: Add description of new watchdog type 3
> > >
> > >  Documentation/watchdog/mlx-wdt.rst   |  10 ++++
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/mlx-platform.c  | 106
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/watchdog/mlx_wdt.c           |  73 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  include/linux/platform_data/mlxreg.h |   5 +-
> 
> > Guess the big question is now which branch to use to take this series.
> > Thoughts, anyone ?
> 
> count(watchdog) = 8
> count(platform) = 6
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux