RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] watchdog: mlx-wdt: introduce a watchdog driver for Mellanox systems.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:13 PM
> To: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] watchdog: mlx-wdt: introduce a watchdog driver for
> Mellanox systems.
> 
> On 2/20/19 1:34 AM, michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Introduce watchdog driver for a various range of Mellanox Ethernet and
> > Infiniband switch systems.
> >
> > Watchdog driver for Mellanox watchdog devices, implemented in
> > programmable logic device.
> >
> > Main and auxiliary watchdog devices can exist on the same system.
> > There are several actions that can be defined in the watchdog:
> > system reset, start fans on full speed and increase a counter.
> > The last 2 actions are performed without a system reset.
> > Actions without reset are provided for auxiliary watchdog devices,
> > which is optional.
> > Access to HW registers is performed through generic regmap interface.
> >
> > There are 2 types of HW watchdog implementations.
> > Type 1: actual HW timeout can be defined as power of 2 msec.
> > e.g. timeout 20 sec will be rounded up to 32768 msec.; maximum timeout
> > period is 32 sec (32768 msec.); get time-left isn't supported Type 2:
> > actual HW timeout is defined in sec. and it's the same as user-defined
> > timeout; maximum timeout is 255 sec; get time-left is supported;
> >
> > Watchdog driver is probed from the common mlx_platform driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> >

Hi Guenter,

Thank you very much for your reviews.

How we should proceed for this patchset?

Who should take it to the next, watchdog or platform mainatainer?

Thanks,
Vadim.
 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux