On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:46:48AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: > On 2018-11-27 03:21, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > BTW, off-topic from this but should we remove ENCLAVE from IOC names as > > they all concern enclaves anyway? Seems kind of redundant. I.e. > > > > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE -> SGX_IOC_CREATE > > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGE -> SGX_IOC_ADD_PAGE > > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT -> SGX_IOC_INIT > > Future ioctls might be added that deal with system-global SGX things? Like > an interface to communicate with the in-kernel LE or something. Yea, maybe better to keep it just in case. The names are not too long anyway. Then the new ioctl should be SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_SET_ATTRIBUTE. /Jarkko
