On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 02:16:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 13:50 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:03:11PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 02:45:05AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > Well, apparently this needs more work. I don't know why I didn't see > > > this > > > recursive error with this version of my patch. I'll see if there is > > > anything I > > > can do... > > > > > > Andy, this means we'll probably have to break testing and roll this > > > back. > > Fine, sometimes crap happens. > > > OK, I spent some time mapping this out and... oi, what a mess. Greg KH > > is here > > at OSLS and I worked through this with him - he suggested just > > simplifying this > > by forcing DELL_SMBIOS to be <= DCDBAS if DCDBAS is enabled. I've > > updated my > > patch in testing to reflect this, and force pushed. Hopefully nobody > > but 0-day > > is impacted. This is bad form, but sending something to Linus with > > Kconfig > > errors would be worse. > > Agree. > > > Avoid the errors by simplifying the dependency and forcing DELL_SMBIOS > > to be <= DCDBAS if DCDBAS is enabled (thanks to Greg KH for the > > suggestion). > > > > Cc: Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Greg KH? I debated that, thought that was perhaps overstating it. :shrug: -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center
