On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:56:57AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
>> > +struct device *device_find_connection(struct device *dev, const char
>> > +*con_id) {
>> > + return __device_find_connection(dev, con_id, generic_match, NULL); }
>>
>> - return __device_find_connection(dev, con_id, generic_match, NULL);
>> + return __device_find_connection(dev, con_id, NULL, generic_match);
>
> Good catch!
It seems I proposed to put function first parameter followed by opaque
data pointer for it.
In that case it would be exactly like now.
Though, I didn't check if the parameter ordering was changed in the prototype.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
