On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 26 January 2018 12:09:01 Marco Martin wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Friday 26 January 2018 10:45:55 Marco Martin wrote: >> >> On martedì 23 gennaio 2018 16:18:24 CET Marco Martin wrote: >> >> > Some laptops such as Dell Inspiron 7000 series have the >> >> > tablet mode switch implemented in Intel ACPI, >> >> > the events to enter and exit the tablet mode are 0xCC and 0xCD >> >> > >> >> > CC: platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> > CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > CC: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> > CC: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > CC: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx> >> >> > CC: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Marco Martin <notmart@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> > --- >> >> > drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >> >> > >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c >> >> > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c index 58c5ff3..64b4b34 100644 >> >> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c >> >> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c >> >> > @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ >> >> > #include <linux/suspend.h> >> >> > #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h> >> >> > >> >> > +/* When NOT in tablet mode, VBDS has the flag 0x40 */ >> >> > +#define TABLET_MODE_FLAG 0x40 >> >> > + >> >> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> >> > MODULE_AUTHOR("AceLan Kao"); >> >> > >> >> > @@ -42,6 +45,8 @@ static const struct key_entry intel_vbtn_keymap[] = { >> >> > { KE_IGNORE, 0xC5, { KEY_VOLUMEUP } }, /* volume-up key release */ >> >> > { KE_KEY, 0xC6, { KEY_VOLUMEDOWN } }, /* volume-down key press */ >> >> > { KE_IGNORE, 0xC7, { KEY_VOLUMEDOWN } }, /* volume-down key release */ >> >> > + { KE_SW, 0xCC, { .sw = { SW_TABLET_MODE, 1 } } }, /* Tablet mode in */ >> >> > + { KE_SW, 0xCD, { .sw = { SW_TABLET_MODE, 0 } } }, /* Tablet mode out */ >> >> > { KE_END }, >> >> > }; >> >> > >> >> > @@ -88,6 +93,7 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, >> >> > void *context) >> >> > >> >> > static int intel_vbtn_probe(struct platform_device *device) >> >> > { >> >> > + struct acpi_buffer vgbs_output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; >> >> > acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev); >> >> > struct intel_vbtn_priv *priv; >> >> > acpi_status status; >> >> > @@ -110,6 +116,21 @@ static int intel_vbtn_probe(struct platform_device >> >> > *device) return err; >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "VGBS", NULL, &vgbs_output); >> >> > + /* VGBS being present and returning something means >> >> > + * we have a tablet mode switch >> >> > + */ >> >> > + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { >> >> > + union acpi_object *obj = vgbs_output.pointer; >> >> > + >> >> > + if (obj && obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { >> >> > + input_set_capability(priv->input_dev, EV_SW, SW_TABLET_MODE); >> >> > + input_report_switch(priv->input_dev, >> >> > + SW_TABLET_MODE, >> >> > + !(obj->integer.value & TABLET_MODE_FLAG)); >> >> > + } >> >> > + } >> >> > + >> >> > status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, >> >> > ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY, >> >> > notify_handler, >> >> >> >> Is there still something to change in this version of the patch? >> > >> > Yes, I already wrote it in thread for older patch version. Calling >> > input_set_capability() is not needed at all because all capabilities are >> > already set by sparse_keymap_setup() function. >> >> ah, sorry, i somehow missed the answer. >> Wouldn't this cause a problem tough? it was querying VGBS to add the >> switch capability just conditionally >> on models which actually have it, so now being in sparse_keymap, all >> will have that switch available even if not there. >> Now, if this is fine (after all that switch would never be triggered >> on such hardware) i can go forward removing all of that so the patch >> becomes a neat two-liner. > > Looking at other drivers and I see that they send initial status of > SW_TABLET_MODE at probe time. I do not know if this is correct or not. > If yes, then you need to call that input_report_switch() as you have. > If not, then then really just 2 line patch is enough. > > But in both cases, call to input_set_capability() is not needed. ok, done in latest version. the initial query and set seems indeed to be necessary, otherwise if i do modprobe of intel-vbtn when in tablet mode, it incorrectly reports 0 as initial state -- Marco Martin