On Thursday 08 June 2017 08:16:18 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > >> Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do
> > >>
> > >> pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id);
> > >>
> > >> instead?
> > >>
> > >> For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be
> > >> done.
> > >
> > > Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE?
> >
> > To me it looks slightly cleaner.
>
> I don't want to let this one fall through the cracks. Pali, is a new one coming?
So.. which modifier to use? Andy already proposed two alternatives and
basically I'm fine all 3 which are in this thread.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
