On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do
> >>
> >> pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id);
> >>
> >> instead?
> >>
> >> For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be
> >> done.
> >
> > Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE?
>
> To me it looks slightly cleaner.
I don't want to let this one fall through the cracks. Pali, is a new one coming?
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
