On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 08:16 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > > > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do
>> > > >
>> > > > pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id);
>> > > >
>> > > > instead?
>> > > >
>> > > > For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be
>> > > > done.
>> > >
>> > > Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE?
>> >
>> > To me it looks slightly cleaner.
>>
>> I don't want to let this one fall through the cracks. Pali, is a new one coming?
>
> Perhaps
> pr_info("\t%*pE\n", (int)sizeof(g->object_id), g->object_id);
It will print some noisy characters as far as I understood the initial
intention.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
