On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 12:17 +0530, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:09:51AM -0800, Shanth Murthy wrote:
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > > +static int intel_pmc_s0ix_counter_read(u64 *data)
> > > +{
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > How about making it static inline and return -ENOSYS instead of
> > -EINVAL?
>
> I'm not sure what's going on.
> Your SoB is in this patch and now it feels like you are reviewing this
> patch.
>
> What should I do?
Sorry about the confusion. We will respin the patch and send V2.
>
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Intel Finland Oy
--
Best Regards,
Rajneesh
