On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 12:17 +0530, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:09:51AM -0800, Shanth Murthy wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
> > +static int intel_pmc_s0ix_counter_read(u64 *data)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
>
> How about making it static inline and return -ENOSYS instead of
> -EINVAL?
I'm not sure what's going on.
Your SoB is in this patch and now it feels like you are reviewing this
patch.
What should I do?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
