On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be > > > rolled into dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions? > > > > Mrm. It's slightly conceptually nasty in that one's an ACPI driver > > and one's calling a Dell custom interface, but I think merging them > > is probably the last bad answer. > > I think merging does not fix our problem. dell laptop rfkill driver > needs to be initialized after dell-rbtn acpi driver register itself. If they were the same driver, you could control this ordering. > > And dell-laptop and dell-rbtn are two different devices (one dell smbios > and one acpi) and it for me it sounds like bad idea too... We all agree it's a bad idea - the point Mathew and I made was it may be the "least bad" idea (all the others may be worse). I'm looking into this, but I don't have an easy answer for you. This one is going to take some research on your part to get to the right answer. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
