On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks > > > > > > <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel > > > > built, but died a glorious death at boot. > > > > > > I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order, > > > dell-laptop starts first, before dell-rbtn, and dies in > > > dell_rbtn_notifier_register() in call to > > > driver_for_each_device(&rbtn_driver.drv, ...) because rbtn_driver has > > > not been registered yet and thus half-initlalized. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > pr_debug() messages could be useful... but no idea if we can get them. > > > > Is there any way to fix that dependency race condition? Could > > driver_attach() function call help? > > I believe you can avoid this by moving dell-rbtn earlier in the Makefile than > dell-laptop - but this is fragile and a hack to resolve a dependency problem. > And what about that late_initcall() instead module_init() in dell-laptop? Will it fix this problem? -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html