Hi Martin, On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... I must admit I did not see this. I realize that this makes my > patch a dead end. I wish I would have seen that earlier, that would > have saved time for everyone. My apologies. > > Regarding the interaction with non-i2c devices in chromeos_laptop, I > was thinking that could perhaps have been solved by putting the i2c > stuff in a separate driver, say chromeos_laptop_i2c, but that point is > irrelevant now that you pointed out that the use of the > detect()-method is discouraged by the documentation. > > Thank you again for reviewing the patch and for providing feedback. No problem at all. Thank you for your interest in our project, actually! If you get a chance, could you let me know if my deferred probe changes work well in your configuration? -- Benson Leung Software Engineer, Chrom* OS bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html