Dear Corentin Chary, [...] > >> This is a generic device, and should be handled by ACPI core > >> (Samsung laptop have this too). See "ACPI ALS" on linux-acpi. > > > > Saying this would be enough. Lee explained to me what this ACPI0008 > > means, I'm quite new to the ACPI land so pardon my ignorance here. But > > it then boils down to Lee's question, why wasn't the patch for ACPI ALS > > that was already proposed accepted? And what can be done to get it in? > > Yep, I've seen Lee's message latter. Regarding ACPI ALS status, it was > forgotten for a long time, and recently Zhang Rui told that he will > take another look at it, but nothing sure. If you want to know more > about the status, you can do a quick search on gmane using "ACPI ALS" > query on linux.acpi Actually, going through the ACPI0008 patch, I see it introduced new sysfs class. Maybe we should rather integrate it with Linux-IIO these days? Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
