Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86,mrst: Intel Medfield over-current detection patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 04:09:29PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ok, if the hardware has no mechanism for reporting the instantaneous 
> > draw then I can see it not working well in an hwmon sense. But I'd 
> > really prefer to see this look far more generic than it does - surely 
> > other hardware has similar functionality?
> 
> I've not seen any - not anything genericisable anyway. I guess in theory
> you could dramatically extend the regulator API to do power draw
> management, bus current monitoring and overcurrent callbacks but I'm not
> sure it would make any sense. What you do with such events and how you
> manage it is incredibly platform specific.
> 
> In the PC world it's not so bad because overcurrent is a fault state -
> you whine about it and either shut down or cross fingers and keep going.
> In embedded devices it's not that simple and it is actively managed.

Yeah, fair enough. I'll queue this up.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux