RE: Patch [4/4] intel scu ipc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

The description I mentioned is confusing.
As Alan said it is not Linux security issue.
Providing indirect read/write api exposes IA registers to user and firmware removed support for these commands/api

--Sreedhara 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cox [mailto:alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 9:54 PM
To: Matthew Garrett
Cc: Ds, Sreedhara; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Patch [4/4] intel scu ipc

On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:50:59 +0100
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:14:06PM +0530, Ds, Sreedhara wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Remove indirect read write api support.
> >  Firmware nolonger support these api, security issue
> 
> What security issues?

It's just stuff that is gone, didn't work out internally. No driver
will use those methods, no public firmware will support them. Dead code
might be a better description.

It's not security in a Linux sense.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux