Thanks krisz, I'll give it a shot sometime.
Thanks
//M
//M
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 1:36 AM Büscsei Krisztián <buscseik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Muhammad,Would not be possibly to separate the 200 ok, from 180. So you send back the 180 from the callback function. 200 will be sent back by a separate function, in this case you have the full control to time it.Krisz_______________________________________________Muhammad El-Sergani <msergani@xxxxxxxxx> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. jún. 16., V, 19:18):_______________________________________________Any ideas?Thanks//MOn Sat, Jun 15, 2019, 12:13 PM Muhammad El-Sergani <msergani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi all,I'm writing an application where two apps will call each other, so no human intervention is required.I need to simulate a real life call-picking-up scenario. So instead of call invite, trying, ringing, and then straight answer, I need to add timers, in other words sleep a couple of seconds here and there.So currently answering the call logic is placed in the onIncomingCall cb, however, whenever I use python's time.sleep(x) method, the whole cb is delayed.If I add a sleep action between the sip180 and sip200 responses (bear in mind I have code there to send sip100), the whole thing is delayed, and the calling party keeps sending the re-invite messages.Any thoughts would be greatly helpful.Thanks
//M
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________ Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
