Hi Tzafrir,
We already received the reports from the Asterisk sometime ago and consolidated with them when best to integrate the patches. And so finally, we have committed those fixes in ticket #2016 (https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/2016) and #2017 (https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/2017).
Thanks,
Ming
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
Asterisk developers maintain a set of patches on top of pjsip:
http://git.asterisk.org/gitweb/?p=asterisk/asterisk. git;a=tree;f=third-party/ pjproject/patches;hb=HEAD
As you can see, the first three are basically configuration changes. The
8 that follow them are backports.
The last two, however, are new and I can't find them in the pjsip SVN
repository. They are:
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security//AST-2017-002. html
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security//AST-2017-003. html
Any reason not to include those patches in our (Debian) pjproject
packages? I have so far only had a cance to verify that they build
properly.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists. pjsip.org
_______________________________________________ Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
