Why pjsip_regc_destroy instead of pjsip_transport_shutdown when register failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry let me elaborate what I did.

I use static void ip_change (and all the other methods mentioned in that 
article, with reachability change detection). But it did not solve my 
problem.

Now I have to call pjsip_transport_shutdown  in on_reg_state2 for 408 
case and that solved the problem.

Thanks,

Qiulang


On 15/8/27 ??7:09, ? ? wrote:
> YES I know that article, it did not help (or I did not get it)
>
> pjsip_transport_shutdown myself is the only solution I can come up 
> right now.
>
>
> On 15/8/27 ??6:54, ?????? ?????? ???????? wrote:
>> Qiulang,
>>
>> please refer to http://trac.pjsip.org/repos/wiki/IPAddressChange
>> May be, you'll find something usefull :)
>>
>> Andrey
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *??: *"? ?" <qiulang at emicnet.com>
>> *????: *"pjsip" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>> *????????????: *???????, 27 ?????? 2015 ? 13:35:55
>> *????: *Re: [pjsip] Why pjsip_regc_destroy instead of 
>> pjsip_transport_shutdown when register failed
>>
>> Sorry, "changing to a new Wifi" means connecting to another AP (my 
>> bad). So we are in a big room and set up 2 APs(but of course they 
>> will get the same outer IP address).
>>
>> The problem we find is that sometime we walk from one side of room to 
>> the other side and the phone has already switched to the other AP, 
>> the app also shows that it has got the new IP address, but when 
>> re-register, pjsip stack still uses the old transport then register 
>> will fail with 408. But even in this case pjsip stack will keep using 
>> old (and invalid) transport to continue to register.
>>
>> The only solution I can come up with right now is call 
>> pjsip_transport_shutdown myself and that does fix the problem! But I 
>> was wondering is there a better way ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Qiulang
>>
>>
>> On 15/8/27 ??4:15, Harald Radke wrote:
>>
>>     Hm, transport is below registration, and I guess you cannot be
>>     sure that the transport is exclusivly used for the registration,
>>     thus if a failed registration attempt would shutdown the transport,
>>     other active connections might suffer from that.
>>     stupid question: "changing to a new Wifi" means connecting to
>>     another AP? doesnt your own IP change on such occasions? Does
>>     your SIP app then still works? Dont you have to restart it anyways?
>>     Regards,
>>     Harry
>>     *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 27. August 2015 um 05:54 Uhr
>>     *Von:* "? ?" <qiulang at emicnet.com>
>>     *An:* "pjsip list" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>     *Betreff:* [pjsip] Why pjsip_regc_destroy instead of
>>     pjsip_transport_shutdown when register failed
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     When register failed, why call pjsip_regc_destroy instead of
>>     pjsip_transport_shutdown (regc_cb in sip_reg.c, pjsip 2.2.1) ?
>>
>>
>>     if (param->code < 0 || param->code >= 300) {
>>         PJ_LOG(2, (THIS_FILE, "SIP registration failed, status=%d
>>     (%.*s)",
>>                param->code,
>>                (int)param->reason.slen, param->reason.ptr));
>>         pjsip_regc_destroy(acc->regc);
>>
>>     In my case (email below) I found acc->regc->last_transport is
>>     NULL, so calling *pjsip_regc_destroy* has no effect. But the
>>     invalid transport still exists and next time when register pjsip
>>     will still use it, which I have not figured out why, so the
>>     register failed!
>>
>>     But if call pjsip_transport_shutdown, register will succeed next
>>     time.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 15/8/17 ??6:15, ? ? wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         When switching to a new WiFi register sometime will fail with
>>         408. It does not always happen but when it happens I run out
>>         of solution but to kill the app and restart it.
>>         I am using pjsip 2.2.1 does anyone experience this and know
>>         how to fix it ?
>>
>>         Thanks
>>
>>         Qiulang
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Visit our blog:http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>>         pjsip mailing list
>>         pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>>         http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________ Visit our blog:
>>     http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>>     http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Visit our blog:http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>>     pjsip mailing list
>>     pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>>     http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog:http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20150827/9cc4a1de/attachment.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux