Unable to find any prescribed behavior for re-inv implementation

[dkboss143@xxxxxxxxx (deepak kumar)]

Hi All,

I am facing this scenario.

B end receiving re-inv before the 'ack of invite transaction'.

   A                  B

    -------inv------------>

    <-----200ok--------

    -----re-inv---------->
    -----ack------------->

    -----re-inv----------->
    -----re-inv----------->

Is there any prescribed behavior for re-inv implementation?
or we can just ignore re-inv.

Thanks
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20140226/97618764/attachment-0001.html>