Hi, I think you're not supposed to send the Contact with the sip.instance stuff, see the example flow in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5626#section-9.5. Frankly I've forgotten the exact reason. Just read the RFC to find out. Best regards, Benny On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Gustavo Garcia Bernardo <ggb at tid.es> wrote: > Reading at the documentation: > "reg_contact > Contact header for REGISTER. It may be different than acc contact if > outbound is used" > > But why do they need to be different instead of always sending the > sip.instance/reg-id tags in all the Contact headers? > > Regards, > G. > > > On 16/05/12 22:51, "Gustavo Garcia Bernardo" <ggb at tid.es> wrote: > > >Are there any reason to use account.contact instead of account.reg_contact > >as Contact header in INVITE/MESSAGE? > > > >That way Contact in INVITE/MESSAGE is missing the sip.instance and reg-id > >tags. > > > >Thank you very much and regards, > >G. > > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20120522/8fcc6363/attachment.html>
