Hi, There shouldn't be any limitations with the setting. Having said that, I haven't tried with 900 (it takes too long to test :) Please try with the latest from svn, which has shorten the PJSIP_TRANSPORT_IDLE_TIME to 33 seconds, which has been reported to have improved battery consumption (https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/1465). If it's still a problem, send the log over. Best regards, Benny 2012/4/22 Jes?s Gumiel <jesus.gumiel at gmail.com> > Hello, > > Are there any limitation in the keep-alive interval for tls?. > > When my PJSIP_TLS_KEEP_ALIVE_INTERVAL is around 300 seconds the > keep-alive are sending properly, but if I increment this value to 900, > it doesn?t work. > > The value of PJSIP_TRANSPORT_IDLE_TIME is 900 too. > > Any idea?. > > Thank you guys > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20120427/1d4ab21b/attachment.html>
