Hi, It's me responding to my message. I finally found out what the problem was, it's located within "pjsua.py" in "class Account:". There are here a lot of static class object, and one of them is "auth_cred = []", which means everytime you instanciate a new Account() object it has the whole credentials of previous instanciated Account() object. This will later create problem as the C API don't support as much account as the auth_cred array has. By just reseting auth_cred to [] in the constructor, i get rid of this problem. Each Account() has now only ONE cred info. So that increasing PJSUA_MAX_ACC without increasing PJSUA_ACC_MAX_PROXIES is enough. I don't know if i did it the proper way, but well, at least it's working for me. Regards, Nicolas On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:37:54 +0100 pjadx at hushmail.com wrote: >Hi, > >I am using the PJSIP python binding to register a *lot* of >account. >"a lot" means approximately 10 K users. >So, first i had to raise the PJSUA_MAX_ACC in config_site.h, but >then i discovered only the first 8 account registered correctly : >Above 8 the digest.username is the 8th, aka the >PJSUA_ACC_MAX_PROXIES'th (it means that the cred[8] will be use as > >username for all the others 10k account minus 8). > >The problem is the following, pjsua_var.acc contains an array of >PJSUA_MAX_ACC, and each one of this struct pjsua_acc contains an >array of PJSUA_ACC_MAX_PROXIES credentials entry. Increasing both >to 10k will make gcc refuse to compile. > >For some reason there is something here i do not understand ; it >seems that each account contain the whole credentials of all >others >accounts. > >Anyway, if I want to have 10k account registering with the 10k >uniq >users, i would have to raise both PJSUA_MAX_ACC and >PJSUA_ACC_MAX_PROXIES to 10k. >But gcc refuse to compile because the structure become too big. > >I am looking for a way to make pjsip work with lot of accounts. >Even if i have to modify the code source and do changement in the >C >code (i am fluent with C). >I am looking at the source code since yesterday and finnally >decide >that you are the best to advise me how to solve it the clean way >without too much ugly hacking. > >Any advise are welcome to resolve this situation. > >Thanks. And thanks for the good work done on PJ. > >Regards, > >Nicolas > > >_______________________________________________ >Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >pjsip mailing list >pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
