Hi gang! Gang Liu schrieb: > This provider's SDP answer isn't correct. > For SDP, it should be only one answer for an offer. > If offer in invite, answer must be first reliable response, which is > only 2xx in RFC 3261, extended in other RFCs. > If answer in provisional response, then need repeated in the 200. I wonder if it would be standard conform if the 200 OK uses a different to-tag (as then it would be a different dialog). regards klaus > > regards, > Gang > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Alexei Kuznetsov <eofster at gmail.com > <mailto:eofster at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Michael Bradley Jr > <mbradley.jr at gmail.com <mailto:mbradley.jr at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> I've noticed a one-way audio problem with one of the SIP > providers. It's > >> definitely a media issue, not a network issue. I make a call, > another > >> party answers and hears me, but I can't her another party. When > he or > >> she starts speaking, the output on my side says > >> > > > > can you please name one of those providers? > > In my case it is the Russian provider pctel.ru <http://pctel.ru/>. > > Alexei > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/> > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
