On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 16:13 +0000, Benny Prijono wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Pedro Sanchez <psanchez at nortel.com> wrote: > > > > I see the point. What response would be considered final in this case? > > > > >From transaction retransmission point of view, any response >= 200 > will terminate the transaction. But normally the other end should > reply with 200 for NOTIFY. > Hmm, I guess it shouldn't. NOTIFY messages, being non-INVITE messages, shouldn't be processed with 200 messages. So, wouldn't it be better to say that any response >200 (not >= ) would do? "Non-INVITE transactions do not make use of ACK." (RFC 3261, section 17.1.2.1) Or am I miss-reading this? -- Pedro > Cheers > benny > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
