Benny, Thanks a lot! Tom ----- Original Message ----- From:Benny Prijono To:pjsip list Subject:Re: [pjsip] bug with nat detection Date:08-03-08 08:35:43 On 3/7/08, sang21 at sina.com <sang21 at sina.com> wrote: > Thus could you tell me : > (1) whether PJ_STUN_ATTR_CHANGED_ADDR attrib is supported by the STUN server pjstun-srv-test-i686-pc-linux-gnu ? Or may I use another stun server with this feature? No for the first question, and yes for the second. The pjstun-srv-test implements the newer version of STUN and TURN drafts (although not the newest one, but I'm working on it), and these newer version has obsoleted CHANGED-ADDRESS attribute, hence pjstun-srv-test doesn't return this attribute. So it's best to use other STUN server for your test. You can get one here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun > (2)whether NAT detection function is spported by the clients pjstun-client-i686-pc-linux-gnu and pjsua-i686-pc-linux-gnu? Yes. > (3)if NAT detection function isn't spported now, how to implement the UDP tranversal through firewall/NAT? You can use ICE, which doesn't care about the NAT type. > (4)whether my networking configuration has problem? If yes, how to confiure it correctly? Not sure about this. cheers, -benny > I'm looking forward to your help. > Thanks a lot! > Sang _______________________________________________ Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip at lists.pjsip.org http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org ------------------------------------------------------------------- ??????????"???? ????"( http://d1.sina.com.cn/sina/limeng3/mail_zhuiyu/2008/mail_zhuiyu_20080218.html ) =================================================================== ????2G?????http://mail.sina.com.cn/? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20080310/2bb710f7/attachment.html