hi all... we are deveoping an interface to the pjsip stack and it's almost done, i mean through the vc++ MFC appication we are able to call the pjsip dll and to register, call, release, unregister to the asterisk server. but can't find the way to fetch the incoming call notification, registration and outgoing calls notification to the sample edit box.... if anyone can help.. On 6/16/08, Ravi Inder Singh <raviinder at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks nanang > Its doing same work :) , my mistake. > In PJSIP > http://www.pjsip.org/download.htm i could only get 0.8.0 Release, but > as you are saying in latest release, where is that newer release located. > Ravi Inder Singh > > Ravi Inder Singh > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Nanang Izzuddin <nanang at pjsip.org> wrote: > >> Hi Ravi, >> >> Shouldn't it? As pjmedia rtcp calculates mean of jitter that way. The >> code of calculating mean seems to be different as the mean needs to be >> updated each time a packet come. >> >> Inputs or comments are greatly appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> nanang >> >> >> 2008/6/16 Ravi Inder Singh <raviinder at gmail.com>: >> > Hi nanang, >> > Thanks alot. >> > I dont have any issues in calculating Jitter values accoding to RFC >> 3550 >> > A.8, >> > now only question arises of "common statistical definition", if we >> see >> > according this then it should be like :- >> > ( sum of all jitter values ) / no of packets . >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ravi Inder Singh >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Nanang Izzuddin <nanang at pjsip.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Ravi, >> >> >> >> Not sure how Wireshark do the calculation, however, the standard >> >> reference of calculating jitter is RFC 3550 A.8. And mean, max, min,s >> >> std dev of jitter are calculated as in common statistical definition. >> >> That's the calculation method used in pjmedia rtcp. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> nanang >> >> >> >> >> >> 2008/6/16 Ravi Inder Singh <raviinder at gmail.com>: >> >> > Hi Nanang, >> >> > Thanks alot. >> >> > This seems to be different method from which wireshark is using , >> >> > wireshark uses (sum of all deltas) / no of packets. >> >> > >> >> > In this file aaa.cap attached , in Statitics ---> RTP--> show all >> >> > streams, >> >> > it shows means Jitter 18.09. >> >> > Your method defined above doesn't give same values . >> >> > >> >> > And in another file mean_calc.pcap ,from (172.26.1.101 --> >> 172.26.1.104 >> >> > ) it >> >> > calculates mean with different method.(Mean value is 1.28 ). I dont >> have >> >> > any >> >> > idea over that ? >> >> > >> >> > Does this wireshark uses some different calculation methodology for >> >> > calculating mean for different no of packets or I am missing >> something >> >> > ? >> >> > >> >> > Coz all are using different method for calculation so i am confused >> over >> >> > it >> >> > . >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > Ravi >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Nanang Izzuddin <nanang at pjsip.org> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Ravi, >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, that is mean jitter, but it seems you are using 0.8.0, no >> >> >> standard deviation jitter calculation in that version. If you work >> >> >> with the latest SVN source, you will get both calculations: mean >> >> >> jitter & standard deviation, even some report blocks of RTCP XR are >> >> >> already implemented (stats summary is one of them). >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> nanang >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2008/6/16 Ravi Inder Singh <raviinder at gmail.com>: >> >> >> > Hi Benny, >> >> >> > I need to calculate Mean Jitter & Deviation Jitter , as per RFC >> >> >> > 3611 >> >> >> > section 4.6 Stats Summary Block >> >> >> > Is this calculation below is mean jitter >> >> >> > sess->avg_jitter = >> >> >> > (jitter + sess->avg_jitter * sess->stat.rx.jitter.count) / >> >> >> > (sess->stat.rx.jitter.count + 1); >> >> >> > >> >> >> > And also Standard deviation jitter for the same. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Thanks & Regards, >> >> >> > Ravi Inder Singh >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> > >> >> >> > pjsip mailing list >> >> >> > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> >> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > Ravi Inder Singh >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > pjsip mailing list >> >> > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks & Regards, >> > Ravi Inder Singh >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> > >> > pjsip mailing list >> > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Ravi Inder Singh > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > -- thanks and regards Sthitapragyan Debasis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20080617/b12ca6cf/attachment.html
