For the moment I haven't much time to do this, but if you give more information maybe I can try. Samuel Benny Prijono a ?crit : > Klaus Darilion wrote: > >>> Hi Samuel, >>> >>> currently pjsip does not interpret this header (it was intentionally >>> left for application), so I guess for now probably we could only >>> manually set the registration timeout to 1800. >>> >> can pjsua handle this correctly? >> > > Nope. It was not implemented because we used to use REGISTER request > as mean for keeping the NAT binding open, so automatically extending > the registration interval didn't sound like good idea. But now that > keep alive is done with CRLF, maybe now we can handle this > automatically in pjsip. > > Now if only somebody could create a patch for this. ;-) > > cheers, > -benny > > >> regards >> klaus >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > >
