Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Hi Samuel, >> >> currently pjsip does not interpret this header (it was intentionally >> left for application), so I guess for now probably we could only >> manually set the registration timeout to 1800. > > can pjsua handle this correctly? Nope. It was not implemented because we used to use REGISTER request as mean for keeping the NAT binding open, so automatically extending the registration interval didn't sound like good idea. But now that keep alive is done with CRLF, maybe now we can handle this automatically in pjsip. Now if only somebody could create a patch for this. ;-) cheers, -benny > regards > klaus
