Sergey Bakulin wrote: > Hi Benny! > > Studying sip_inv.c (as the best example of pjsip dialog usage) I noticed > one contradiction between code and comments. In function > inv_respond_incoming_cancel() in case of "Invite transaction not found" > the response is created with status code 200, while in comments said > "Respond CANCEL with 491". And really you mean status code 481 (Call > Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist), as on page 55 RFC 3261, do you? Yeah, it should be 481, thanks for catching this (I've realized this since long time ago, but I thought nobody will notice ;-) ). I've fixed this in http://www.pjsip.org/trac/ticket/426. I also changed few other places in sip_inv.c, so that incoming 481 response to CANCEL does not terminate the session (as per rfc 5057). cheers, -benny > P.S. Thanks for Changeset 1594. > > Best regards, > Sergey
