On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 14:45 -0400, Govinda wrote: > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > I could not follow on how it can be faster using your advise. > > Seems you focus on how it could be slower using a random suffix each call to assure no caching is involved. > > > > Any practical advise or references/example how to make it faster for the initial call ? > > Any methods from the enhanced HTTP of V1.1 ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Eli > > > > Eli, > (Ash will correct me if I am wrong).. but think the point of Ash's suggested test was to first determine *what* is causing the slowness.. and THEN fix it (turn it off, or alter it). > How are you going to fix it if you do not even know what is the cause? > > -Govinda I was trying to show how the slower responses could be normal. As there are no specific times given from request to response, there could be any number of places where something is slowed down. However, first you need to get a baseline, and to do that you need to eliminate the cache speed advantages from the equation. >From there, look at a plugin for Fx called Firebug, which will show you the time it takes to make requests. -- Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
