On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Ravi Gehlot <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why mess with something that is already working? If you are trying to make > it pretty then you are not solving a problem. You are creating one. Define working. I've had programs 'work', but more experienced would say it's flawed in some respect. Does it perform the immediate task? Now define pretty. Is it aesthetically pleasing to you, or to someone else with less, or maybe more experience. By defining the two above, you then define whether it's a problem. To you, or to them, or to the original designer? > > Ravi. > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Daniel P. Brown > <daniel.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:49, Simcha Younger <simcha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Since it is being included by PHP, and not served by Apache, the >> extension is not important. >> >> Correct, but keep in mind that it will likely be served as plain >> text if accessed directly, if the web server is not properly >> configured (which, by default, it isn't). >> >> -- >> </Daniel P. Brown> >> Dedicated Servers, Cloud and Cloud Hybrid Solutions, VPS, Hosting >> (866-) 725-4321 >> http://www.parasane.net/ >> >> -- >> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > -- They're installing the breathalyzer on my email account next week. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
