On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tommy Pham wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> * If you could implement threads and run those same queries in 2+ >>>> threads, the total time saved from queries execution is 1/2 sec or >>>> more, which is pass along as the total response time reduced. Is it >>>> worth it for you implement threads if you're a speed freak? >>> >>> Use mysqlnd - asynchronous mysql queries. >>> >> >> You're assuming that everyone in the PHP world uses MySQL 4.1 or >> newer. What about those who don't? > > They don't get to use threading, nor asynchronous mysql queries. > > Come on, you're asking about a future feature in PHP 7.x , but would > like to support someone who is seriously backlevel on mysql?? > > > -- > Per Jessen, Zürich (16.9°C) > I'm not talking about MySQL 4.0 or older. I'm talking about other RDBMS. I think you should open your eyes a bit wider and take a look at the bigger picture (Firebird, MSSQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, etc). -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
