On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, John Black <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Bob McConnell wrote: > >> I just checked the Red Hat 5.4 manifest and it shows php-5.1.6-23.el5 - >> php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3. CentOS simply repackages the Red Hat kit without >> the proprietary bits. I don't understand why they are so far behind on a >> build that was just released last month, but our hosting service only >> provides what's in the official release. >> > > I just check the CentOS repo and the repo lists > php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3.x86_64.rpm as latest. > So CentOS is as upto date as RedHat, the way it should be. > > -- > John > Define: Ubuntard => The drivel this guy spews is inane and forgettable > stuff, characterized by comments that treat Ubuntu as if it is the only > distribution in existence. > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > That is not good. 5.1.6 was released in August 2006. More than 3 years ago. There are a lot of bug fixes since then http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php It looks like the php libraries are not maintained in CentOS and Red Hat Repositories. -- "Good Enough" is not good enough. To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. Quality First. Measure Twice. Cut Once.
