On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ray Hauge <ray.hauge.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just read an interesting article about enterprise software. One of the > most common arguments against PHP tends to be "It's not enterprise ready." > This article talks more about ruby, but it could be about any > "non-enterprise" language as well. > > http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-tol/2005-April/000772.html > > I recently got a new job at a hospital, and the "enterprise software" they > have is no where near as high quality as it could/should be. This is my > first job at a somewhat large organization (500+ employees) so I was kind of > shocked at the state of their software. Typically healthcare systems are > further behind in the technology adoption, but having to deal with > workarounds all day long sure gets old. > > -- > Ray Hauge > www.primateapplications.com > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Well, I know one problem is the view of "free" or "opensource" in some people's eyes is that there must be something wrong with it. PHP falls into this category. I work for a large corporation, we use PHP here, Yahoo uses it, a lot of places use it. It can handle enterprise. Really, I think the architecture of the software would dictate that more than that language. -- -Dan Joseph www.canishosting.com - Plans start @ $1.99/month. Reseller plans and Dedicated servers available. "Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for the rest of the day. Light a man on fire, and will be warm for the rest of his life."
