On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Stut <stuttle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote: > > > tedd wrote: > > > > > Hi gang: > > > This is what I did this morning: > > > http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/ > > > It speaks for itself. > > > Cheers, > > > tedd > > > > > > > tedd, > > > > Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one of > your more simple pages: I get a JS "urchinTracker() not defined" error on > your site, almost certainly because NoScript is blocking UrchinTracker... > > > > Perhaps you should wrap that naked call to urchinTracker() in a > conditional - maybe as simple as > > > > if (urchinTracker) urchinTracker(); > > > > <pet-peeve> > > I really hate seeing JS errors on published sites (i.e. not development > sandboxes) > > </pet-peeve> > > > > 'course, there are many sites that make the same call to urchinTracker(), > and many many worse errors... > > > > I see your pet peeve and I'll raise you one of mine... > > <pet-peeve> > People who use Javascript blockers, especially Javascript blockers that do > a half-arsed job which causes errors. > </pet-peeve> > > If you're going to block Javascript, block it. Don't use something that > tries (and apparently fails) to block it intelligently. > > What are you so afraid of? > > -Stut > > -- > http://stut.net/ > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > The internet is the wild west. It's always best to come with protection. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
