Re: Class Static variables in double quoted string or heredoc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:11 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 10:55 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > bah; concatenation operator - schmacatatenation operator!  i dont
> really
> > > > care about that; but i would like to see support for $a::$someStatic
> come
> > > > back.  thats what im whining about ;)
> > >
> > > That funny part, IMHO, is that on internals they often complain about
> > > new features not being simple enough for the supposed mentally
> incapable
> > > masses. And yet there's support for this kind of double quoting stuff
> > > that just makes me think poor form, bad style, and where's my t-shirt.
> >
> >
> > are you saying this feature is too esoteric for you ? :)
>
> No, it's too, hmmm... what's the word... REDUNDANT!
>
> :)
>

actually, its a little cleaner if you ask me.  infact i think being able to
delimit strings in either single or double quotes was a precursor to this.
example: java; if i want to have double quotes in a string i *have* to
escape them w/in the string \".  in php or javascript; i simply delimit the
string w/ single quotes.  this feature is simply an evolution of that
concept, IMHO.

> besides i didnt create the double quoted support and thats not even what
im
> arguing about anyway.  the syntax ive mentioned was there in a pre-5.2.4
> release (discovered it didnt actually make the cut for the 5.2.4)  it save
> you from having to write ugly little helper methods and thats a benefit i
> wouldnt mind having.

There's a reason they call it "pre-release". It means it's not
> "final" ;)
>

what the world needs is a term for the 'pre-release' being cooler than the
release ;)

> php has a great dilema, it wants to cater to a wide range of users; from
> newbs to experts.  thats a massive undertaking and well if youre gonna do
> it, you may as well go whole-hog IMHO.

I don't see how the throwing everything and the kitchen sink into double
> quotes support caters to either of these groups. It strikes me, and of
> course that's who matters here >:),


i matter more !:D


> that it caters to the messy, "I wish
> I REALLY knew what I was doing", slovenly crowd.
>

if you dont know about the concatenation operator my thought is you wont be
going far w/ php or any other language for that matter :)

Just because a feature exists, doesn't mean you should use it!
>

here we are back at the classic syntactic sugar argument.  at least weve
moved past abstract classes and interfaces !

good times :D

-nathan

[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux