----- Original Message ----- From: Andrés Robinet <agrobinet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Wolf'" <lonewolf@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Jason Pruim'" <japruim@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "'TG'" <tg-php@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Daniel Brown'" <parasane@xxxxxxxxx>, "'PHP General List'" <php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:58:26 -0400 > How about when someone "middle-posts" like this... such as some kind of "quoting attempt"... This is acceptable if there are multiple points. Better than trying to address each point at the top OR bottom. That just gets awkward. > Or even worse... tries to quote several of the previous posters in several places? That's no problem as long as the quoted text included is relevant to the response or may be helpful if getting someone "caught up" on at least that segment of the conversation. It doesn't have to include everything having been said since the beginning of the conversation. > So in the end everything is screwed up... What's screwed up? Is this unclear? This is more about what people choose to leave in a message versus what they should be trimming out than an issue of top/inline/bottom posting. > ... and he/she still ends with a > > "Regards, > > Mr X" > > ..as if he/she did no wrong? Wrong in your eyes, but that's pretty subjective. > That's the bad thing :D Is it? hah. -TG sorry... "Regards.. -TG" hah -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
