On Jan 15, 2008 7:31 AM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > when i said a function would have to be loaded into the interpreter to > avoid a runtime error > upon invocation, i didnt mention that its best to programatically verify > it can be called before > letting the runtime error occur (of course you can let that happen if you > prefer :)), to avoid it. > anywho, i prefer the variable function construct more than > call_user_func(), simply > because it feels a bit more natural to me, but semantically, they are the > same, they just have > a different syntax is all. i suppose call_user_func() is a bit more clear > and might help some > people when drifting through the code of others. > cool contrived example, btw ;) > actually, it does appear that call_user_func() and call_user_func_array() are a bit more powerful than variable functions as they permit a dynamic number of actual parameters, whereas the number of parameters using the variable function construct is static. -nathan
