this is getting good; i want to know why its *flawed* now too. no pressure :) -nathan On 7/4/07, Stut <stuttle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andrew Hutchings wrote: > In article <200707041544.30740.php@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > php@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Mark Kelly) wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> On Wednesday 04 July 2007 13:01, Andrew Hutchings wrote: >> >>> Avoid the O'Reilly one as it is flawed. > >> In what way? > > Its written by Chris Shiflett, isn't that enough reason? There's no need for that without justification. Please justify that comment. -Stut -- http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
