On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 13:40 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 6:37 pm, Daniel Kasak wrote: > > Actually, that blog had absolutely nothing to do with my problem > > ( thanks for RTFP!). Not only that, but the recommendation that I > > construct URLs: > > > > http://address.com/script/thing=2/this=3/that=4/download.txt > > > > is patently ridiculous. > > Why? It's excessively complex for no actual benefit. It means you have to have extra code to 'explode' out the various parts of the URL. Even after reading your description of the code that handles this, it was non-obvious what it was for. If I returned to this 2 years later ( or God forbid, someone else had to look at it ), they wouldn't have a clue what it was doing, or why. But also, as I noted, this 'solution' is to a different problem - the problem of IE not naming downloads properly. IE names them properly for me ... it just doesn't download them ( if over SSL ). -- Daniel Kasak IT Developer NUS Consulting Group Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060 T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989 email: dkasak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
