Hi Tijnema, Friday, May 25, 2007, 5:58:46 PM, you wrote: > On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Very. Each directory contains very specific types of code/content. >> Tracking down where any given function, class, custom tag, behaviour, >> etc is defined is extremely simple. >> >> Cheers, >> Rob. > I don't agree with you, i have includes in includes dir inside my > project, images in images, etc. classes in includes dir start with > class. configuration files in includes start with config. etc. Oh to work on such little sized sites again :) Not that I'm belittling your projects Tijnema, because I'm not - but I've not worked on a site with a structure that could be that simple for a long time now, I kinda miss it actually!! Hell even the 'images folder' had to be split across multiple servers in the code I finished today. A lot of Robert's structure makes complete sense. I never keep libraries inside the webroot that simply don't need to be there. Infact if a script doesn't output anything 'web related' (image, rss, html) or process data from the site, it doesn't need to live in the webroot at all. I use a similar principal for the 'admin' area of the site too, which I'm sure you'd hate ;) but I always code my admin areas so that they can run on an entirely different domain name and/or server if needs be. Only as a last resort do they ever live in /admin, and never will they share libs that the 'public' site uses, they are entirely stand-alone entities. You're right in that it is down to personal preference though :) Cheers, Rich -- Zend Certified Engineer http://www.corephp.co.uk "Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window" -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
