Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2007 2:50 pm, Stut wrote:
WeberSites LTD wrote:
1st, I never said I was any authority about anything :)
I'm just building the weber sites as a hobby...
Hobby or not, when you publish information on the web without a big
message saying "I have no frickin' idea what I'm talking about", you
are
presenting yourself as an authority on the subject. And when you
answer
questions on a mailing list with links to your site you are
re-enforcing
that point.
Just to play Devil's Advocate...
Are you suggesting that every site on the 'net, or even just those
which LOOK like worthy material, without such a disclaimer, IS
authoritative?...
:-)
"People" are stupid, and they believe what they want to believe. If
they're looking for an answer, they'll take any answer that comes along,
usually without any concern about the source.
So no, I'm not saything that every site on "the 'net" IS authoritative,
I'm saying that anyone publishing information in any medium needs to
understand that people will assume they know what they're talking about.
Taking this a step further, or dragging it out into an open discussion:
I'm not a real huge fan of the folks on this list who post almost as
often as I with links to their own ad-revenue sites, but they are at
least (usually) on-topic and with valid information available to the
reader.
It might be better if they sprinkled in links to php.net or even
(gasp!) a "competitor's" site sometimes, but it's not like total
spamming, eh?
There are even times where I know that there is specific content on
such a site, and I'll recommend it.
SO where do you draw the line?
Seems to me we have to be reasonable about that.
And we also have to expect the Reader to at least have half a clue and
do some basic research about the source[s] of their info, and their
vested interests, and choose for themselves what info to pursue...
Though based on experience with some posts, that may be expecting more
than will actually happen. Aim high. :-)
I agree that the reader should realise that not everything they read
will be accurate, but readers tend to be people and are therefore
generally stupid. Anyone who disagrees with that either lives in a box
or demonstrates the point.
Where do I draw the line? I draw the line at mis-information. However, I
could have phrased my comment slightly better, and for that I apologise.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
