On 4/26/07, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 19:17 +0200, Tijnema ! wrote: > On 4/26/07, tedd <tedd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At 5:26 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote: > > >On 4/26/07, tedd <tedd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>At 5:06 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote: > > >>>It's not XHTML 1.0 Strict valid .. :P > > >>>You're page is HTML 4.01 valid, i think you should make it XHTML 1.0 Strict. > > >> > > >>Argggg. Then I would have to add all those "/" to my ">" in all my > > >>code in all my sites. Literally millions of new "/" would have to be > > >>added. That act could possibly crash the net. > > >> > > >>So, until someone points out a good reason for me to change (I'm open > > >>for redirection), I'll continue to use what works for me. Besides, > > >>it's still compliant, isn't it? > > >> > > >>Cheers, > > >> > > >>tedd > > > > > >HTML 4.01 will become deprecated earlier then XHTML 1.0 :) > > > > > >That's all i know :P > > > > > >Tijnema > > > > And tedd will become deprecated earlier than teddd -- I can wait. > > > > Besides, when HTML 4.01 finally does, someone will make a parser that > > will fix everything. > > > > Cheers, > > > > tedd > > Hmm, if that is gonna work completly, i want to see :P > Look how many things are deprecated/removed in XHTML 1.0 Strict v HTML 4.01 > A lot things have been replaced with styles in XHTML 1.0 Strict. > > I see microsoft as the first one that will ignore HTML 4.01, in IE8 maybe? So we're talking around 2012? Hell, I'll be retired by then!!! ;) Cheers, Rob.
You maybe, but not everyone (like me :P) I would love to, but well, i guess i can't stop when i'm 20 years old :) Tijnema -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
