On 4/26/07, tedd <tedd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 5:26 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote: >On 4/26/07, tedd <tedd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>At 5:06 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote: >>>It's not XHTML 1.0 Strict valid .. :P >>>You're page is HTML 4.01 valid, i think you should make it XHTML 1.0 Strict. >> >>Argggg. Then I would have to add all those "/" to my ">" in all my >>code in all my sites. Literally millions of new "/" would have to be >>added. That act could possibly crash the net. >> >>So, until someone points out a good reason for me to change (I'm open >>for redirection), I'll continue to use what works for me. Besides, >>it's still compliant, isn't it? >> >>Cheers, >> >>tedd > >HTML 4.01 will become deprecated earlier then XHTML 1.0 :) > >That's all i know :P > >Tijnema And tedd will become deprecated earlier than teddd -- I can wait. Besides, when HTML 4.01 finally does, someone will make a parser that will fix everything. Cheers, tedd
Hmm, if that is gonna work completly, i want to see :P Look how many things are deprecated/removed in XHTML 1.0 Strict v HTML 4.01 A lot things have been replaced with styles in XHTML 1.0 Strict. I see microsoft as the first one that will ignore HTML 4.01, in IE8 maybe? Tijnema -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
