That test was very basic though. It's easy for the kernel to cache the same response, but it does at least show that it can/does improve performance. I think it would be silly to expect those kinds of numbers for every application. You also have to remember that the stability is based on the Windows server, which its track record isn't exactly as good as Linux/BSD systems. Ray > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Microsoft Partners With Zend > From: "Curt Zirzow" <czirzow@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, November 01, 2006 4:53 pm > To: steve <iamstever@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Daevid Vincent" <daevid@xxxxxxxxxx>, php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > On 11/1/06, steve <iamstever@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/1/06, Daevid Vincent <daevid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Personally I'm unsure. I would like to think that Zend is smart enough to > > > realize M$ tactics of embrace/extend and will not allow that to happen. > > > > MS added a FastCGI module to IIS. Thats the big thing. > > They demo'd it at the zend conference with IIS7 on vista (installed on > a macbook pro), there is also a bunch of work zend has done to improve > speed.. the non improved php5 version benched like 30 requests/sec, > the zend patched version did over 100 requests/sec. > > Then they demo'd the kernel cache; 6500 requests/sec. (and no i didn't > typo and add an extra zero). > > Curt. > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
