"Ed Lazor" <edlazor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:50BC520B-9A78-4E9B-B32F-ABCAEFA2F229@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote: >> Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development >> efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research >> projects this is backwards for a web-based system. This is exactly the >> practice I am trying to discourage. It's a well-known fact that code >> generators are a poor substitute for real developers. > > I agree with Stut, but I'd also like to check out a copy of the > framework. It seems like a lot of people are using frameworks now days > and I can't help but wonder if they provide similar performance as the > OOP library that Stut uses. If you want to build administrative web applications which have a small number of users, and where development costs are more important than performance of execution (i.e. developer cycles over cpu cycles) then check out RADICORE at http://www.radicore.org It is better than Ruby on Rails. -- Tony Marston http://www.tonymarston.net http://www.radicore.org -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
