Jay, I am not quite sure if you've made sarcastic comments but to make things more clear... I'd like to use GD instead of ImageMagick beacuse I would not want to install extra packages if I can. When I mentioned that I use convert I said 'when GD is not available...' So I have alternatives: if there is no GD support go with ImageMagick. If there is support use GD. On 5/22/06, Jay Blanchard <jblanchard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip] I know the imagemagick tools. I use convert when I need to perform operations on images and gd is not available. I'd like an alternative without having to install any extra packages specially that in this case the scripts will be hosted in a win32 machine (windows xp). [/snip] Ah. Well. You could have saved me the effort by being more descriptive in your first post. 1. Doesn't want to use GD. Check. 2. Doesn't want to use Imagemagick. Check. 3. Doesn't want to install extra packages. Check. 4. SOL. Check.
