That's ok, but then I can't help you more than I tried to. Just check with what I told you about debug_backtrace(), at least that way you can trace where the function was called with wrong arguments. 2006/4/29, Dave Goodchild <buddhamagnet@xxxxxxxxx>:
Misleading to who? I own the app and am the only person who will ever use it. Rather anal. On 29/04/06, Martin Alterisio < malterisio777@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2006/4/28, Barry < barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Martin Alterisio schrieb: > > > 2006/4/28, Dave Goodchild <buddhamagnet@xxxxxxxxx>: > > >> > > >> Hi all - I am attempting to solve some maddening behaviour that has > me > > >> totally stumped and before I take a blade to my throat I thought I > > would > > >> pick the brains of the group/hive/gang. > > >> > > >> I am working on a viral marketing application that uses multipart > > emails > > >> to > > >> notify entrants of their progress in the 'game'. I have a demo > version > > >> which > > >> works fine, and the current rebranded version was also fine until > the > > >> client > > >> asked for some changes then POWWWWW! > > >> > > >> I will try and define the issue as simply as I can. I am passing 11 > > >> arguments to a function called sendSantaMail (don't ask) and as a > > sanity > > >> check I have called mail() to let me know the values just before > they > > are > > >> passed in to the function. I get this result: > > > > > > > > > sendSantaMail???? That's just not a *declarative* way of naming a > > function. > > Do you know what "santa" means? No? so how can you tell it's not > > declarative. > > Santa could be a coded Mailer and that functions uses that specific > > Mailer Deamon called "santa" to send mails. > > > Yeah you're right, I was thinking the exact same thing a while after I > posted that. Maybe it was a correct name in the context used, but, I > still > think "Santa" is a really misleading name for a mailer, and not to > mention > that a mass mailer identifying itself as "Santa mailer" in the headers > is > asking to be send directly to spam. Anyway, I was wrong. > > > Then, 11 arguments???? Errr, passing an associative array with the > email > > > parameters wouldn't have been a cleaner and better option? > > > > He just told he passes 11 arguments, never told how he does that. > > > Well, if somebody tells you a function has 11 arguments what would you > think? > > -- http://www.web-buddha.co.uk dynamic web programming from Reigate, Surrey UK (php, mysql, xhtml, css) look out for project karma, our new venture, coming soon!
